Rights Contact Login For More Details
More About This Title Wittgenstein: Opening Investigations
- English
English
- Critically engages with the most recent exegetical literature on Wittgenstein and other state-of-the-art philosophical work
- Encourages the re-incorporation of Wittgenstein studies into the mainstream philosophical conversation
- Has profound consequences for how we go on to read the rest of Wittgenstein’s major work
- Makes a significant contribution not only to the literature on Wittgenstein, but also to studies in philosophy of language
- English
English
- English
English
Preface ix
Introduction xiii
I.1 Things Unravel – A Snapshot xiii
I.2 Four Key Points xv
I.3 Seeing the Text Aright xvii
I.4 Opening Methodological Remarks xxiii
I.5 Outline xxviii
1 Beginning with §1 1
1.1 Starting with Augustine 1
1.2 Three Things in Section 1 4
1.3 Names are Fundamental 9
1.4 The Wide Angle View 15
1.5 From the Augustinian Conception to Language Games 18
2 Ostensive Definition: The Shape of the Argument 35
2.1 Introduction 35
2.2 Ostension and Ostensive Definition 37
2.3 Two Issues: Metaphysical and Developmental 44
2.4 Substantive and Commonplace Roles for Ostension 47
2.5 Wittgenstein’s Use of “Ostensive Definition” 57
2.6 Wittgenstein on Learning 66
2.7 Ostensive Definition 74
3 Linguistic Regularity, Grammar and Autonomy 88
3.1 Introduction 88
3.2 Regularity and Grammar – Explanations and Travelogs 89
3.3 Norms, Fitness, Going Up the Garden Path 95
3.4 Wittgenstein’s Idealism 98
3.5 Platitudes – From Bold to Modest Realism 101
3.6 Wittgenstein’s Argument 108
3.7 Demonstrative Thoughts 114
3.8 Closing “Oughts” 116
4 Explanations 125
4.1 Introduction 125
4.2 Three Claims in §109 127
4.3 Philosophy can Offer No Explanations 132
4.4 Insightful Descriptions 143
4.5 The Sense of Fit 152
Appendix What Happens to the Private Language Argument? 159
Bibliography 170
Index 000
- English
English
“Despite apparently underplaying the importance of the Tractatusin the genesis of the later philosophy, though, Luntley’s book is a very valuable challenge to any complacency we may feel about how to interpret the opening paragraphs of Wittgenstein’s great unfinished masterpiece.” (Philosophical Quarterly, Advanced Access, 18 December 2016)