New to Pubmatch? Register Now!
Already a member? Login


Name:- Dr. Bhavatosh Chandra, S/o Sri Narendra Nath,
At/P.O.:- Partawal Bazar,
Dist :- Mahrajganj, U.P. India,
D.O.B: 09/01/1961,
Qual: BSc.(Bio),Ayurved Ratna,
Status: Married with Smt. Reena Devi in July 24th 1988,now having a daughter
Kumari Deepika (20Yrs),
Experience: Medical service (pvt)for 25 Yrs.
Hobby: To search for science.
Became a author in 1997 just after visiting a great saint Swami Paramhanshji
Maharaj of Mujahana Ashram, Sitapur, U.P.
First book written: Sristi Ka Mahavigyan (Hindi), Not published
E... View More »
Name:- Dr. Bhavatosh Chandra, S/o Sri Narendra Nath,
At/P.O.:- Partawal Bazar,
Dist :- Mahrajganj, U.P. India,
D.O.B: 09/01/1961,
Qual: BSc.(Bio),Ayurved Ratna,
Status: Married with Smt. Reena Devi in July 24th 1988,now having a daughter
Kumari Deepika (20Yrs),
Experience: Medical service (pvt)for 25 Yrs.
Hobby: To search for science.
Became a author in 1997 just after visiting a great saint Swami Paramhanshji
Maharaj of Mujahana Ashram, Sitapur, U.P.
First book written: Sristi Ka Mahavigyan (Hindi), Not published
English Version : Translated in 2000 and revised so many times to add something more,
Finally composed in computer : in 2005.
Name of the book: Concept 2005-8, ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE,a complete
solution.
Looking for: A suitable publisher for my book.
Genre : Reference article of meta physics & dedicated to science & research
Previously published: No
Book Formating : Pagemaker and Coral Draw
Total pages: 250
Copyright: Under processing
Author : Dr. B. Chandra
Email: chandrabhavatosh@yahoo.com
Phone: 09936415535 «View Less
Looking for a suitable publisher. For a brief detail, I am submitting the synopsis of my manuscript :
Title: Concept 2005-8, ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE
SYNOPSIS : ABSTRACT
The concept of the cosmic world and the beginning of universe is in
fact too hard to be confirm because all the cosmic productive phenomenon are
far beyond of our direct approach or of their authentic observations.
Different scholars and related experts have proposed their hypothetical
assumptions or theories differently. Even the latest modern scientific
consideration of the universe runs itself under some complicated and dubious
calculations of GUT (Grand Unified Theory) which does not include the
gravitational effect of the matter-particles at the hyper energetic
condition of GUE (g... View More »
Looking for a suitable publisher. For a brief detail, I am submitting the synopsis of my manuscript :
Title: Concept 2005-8, ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE
SYNOPSIS : ABSTRACT
The concept of the cosmic world and the beginning of universe is in
fact too hard to be confirm because all the cosmic productive phenomenon are
far beyond of our direct approach or of their authentic observations.
Different scholars and related experts have proposed their hypothetical
assumptions or theories differently. Even the latest modern scientific
consideration of the universe runs itself under some complicated and dubious
calculations of GUT (Grand Unified Theory) which does not include the
gravitational effect of the matter-particles at the hyper energetic
condition of GUE (grand unified energy).
The Hot Big-Bang model (theory), form which the universe would have
started off and it is uniformly expanding forever, implies a probable centre
point of the universe (the right position of the primitive nebula or
nucleus), so, there should be a parameter or boundary of that. To draw a
boundary line of such universe, it seems not so justifiable; so it may be
dubious. Whenever, this theory does not clarify how the primordial nebula
would haver formed and what was that's former condition. Where the big-bang
theory provides that there should have a grand contraction of the entire
universe and that should collapse into a primordial nebula (centre), but the
present rate of expansion of the universe rejects itself the probability of
such contraction.
In fact the contraction of the universe into a small ball (nebula)
seems not so suitable in the view of Pauli's exclusion principle and also in
respect to the classical but original law of the critical density and
critical condensation of matters, that each matter reserves a least value of
critical density and contraction of that's mass, no matter how much the
pressure or compressor is increasing more and more.
....Plank's Constant
The galactic separation and the "microwaves' background radiation", which
both imply that the universe is expanding uniformly continuously, can be
taken in an another way of classical physics caused by the dynamic
circulation of the spatial bodies.
...new proposal
The concept of Hawking's black hole provides that eventually all the
matters of entire universe should be dragged into a single black hole, and
afterward, that should get a final burst to regenerate or produce the
galactic fuel providing the big-bang explosion again. This theme also turns
to the limitation of the universe, so that, it seems also dubious. Where,
the density and contraction of the universe (such black hole) should also
follow or should burst out as like a supernova type explosion. This also
implies that we should not be so hopeful that all the matters of the
universe should be dragged into a single black hole, and so, a single
big-bang explosion for the entire generation of the cosmic universe.
Conclusively, the concept of the beginning of the universe from the
big-bang explosion is fully dubious and it is full of singularity that does
not follow the laws of physics. Possibly, in the coming future, when the GUT
would add up the gravitational force in itself, it will reject the
possibility of such big-bang theory for the original beginning of the
universe.
The 'Concept-2005-8' introduced in this script by this author, is
mostly based on the logical and scientific theories. It has attempted to
solve all the reasonable queries and problems related with under the laws
and theories of the modern physics. For the beginning, it has provided two
assumptions; such as :
(1) The first assumption provides that the antiparticles and quarks
are not the initial particles because it hold their recently hyper-energetic
background and it run with that only. These energetic particles can not
survive in normal or initial conditions. In this assumption, we can suppose
that before the beginning when there was nothing else visible in the
infinite sky, the initial matter-particles etc. and their antiparticles were
present in the form of energy-waves. Further, they would have collided or
annihilated and released energies. Due to so long process of annihilations
and collisions, the initial atoms (1H1) would have formed and collected
locally (regionally) place to place. Gradually, those collections would have
caused to produce the protostars what would have evolved and converted into
shining stars or suns respectively.
(2) Because of all the natural creative phenomenon seem likely to
run as normally that we don't take any adequate notice of that, as the ebbs
and tide, the earth-quakes, weather changings, germination of seeds,
rainfalls etc. which do not have any recently background of hyper or sudden
energetic condition, similarly we can assume that the initial beginning of
the universe would have started off with the normal conditions. So that, the
second assumption runs with a quite normal sky and with the pertaining
normal fundamental particles of photons / electrons / protons / neutrinos
etc. stable atomic particles. It has also provided some established physical
laws and theories to make the initial interactions between those initial
particles, such as 'Compton effect / Photoelectric effect / Fynnman diagram
/ Plank's quantum law / Threshold energy etc. along with some other
reasonable laws.
This concept provides a more clear diagram of the stellar evolution
infavour of the modern consideration, and, it is solving the major problems
of that concerned. On the other hand, it is also introducing a systematic
and clear mode of nuclear reactions in the stars caused to promote the
stellar evolution.
On the next step, it has attempted to modify the modern
consideration of constitution of the earthen planets and other related. It
has also attempted to solve all the related problems of angular momentum of
the orbiting planets so classically and so scientifically. According to
this, the matters of the planets would have made up of the sun-matters what
have transmuted caused by threshold energy that would have provided by the
thermonuclear etc. atomic reactions held in the sun. The satellites would
have formed by the collisions of those escaping tail-parts of the gaseous
planet with their forgoing head-parts. The asteroids should be the aparted
sections of the tail-part of the escaping Jupiter or of the excreted
eruptions of the planet Mars. And, the comet should be the collections of
light gaseous dusty-particles or smoky-clusters of the sun which are
circulating as the conjunctives between two or more solar systems with the
cyclic motion.
In the next series of the planetary constitution, it has introduced
an exclusive and mysterious probability of the 'Bermuda Triangle' and the
most suspicious UFOs (Flying Disks). According to this fiction like
scientific assumption, the modern science should have a familiar contact
with an another probable alien-civilization from where the UFOs are coming
here. In these chapters, it have drawn a probable geographical or geological
and technological (exclusively theoretical) diagram of the Bermuda Triangle
and of those UFOs and also attempted to solve all the relevant problems so
scientifically and systematically.
Significantly, even all these concepts are preserving the theories
of physics of these days and so it bear its maximum possibility and
conformity, but, it need a smooth scruitining by the relevant scientific
experts for it's real valuation. On the other hand, the chapters of Bermuda
Triangle and the U.F.Os are mostly sensetive for the defence research, so
that, this script 'CONCEPT-2005-8: THE ORIGIN OF UNIVERSE' IS BEING
DEDICATED TO THE HON'BLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA / GOVT. OF INDIA. «View Less
| Manju Vimal | |
| View phone number |
|
| View email address | |
| asha Devi | |
| View phone number |
|
| View email address | |
| Margareta Anderson | |
| View phone number |
|
| View email address | |
| Asha Chaddha | |
| View phone number |
|
| Linda | |
| View email address | |




